View this Free Essay in PDF format

This free essay has been submitted by: Guest User

Compromise

Since the beginning of history, human life has been afflicted with compromises. It is an agreement of differences in which each side makes mutual concessions and strive towards settlement. The contributors of an argument may not always attain a final compromise. This is because one side of the controversy is generally right while the opposing side is generally wrong. When both participants reach a path towards agreement, neither side is truly satisfied; however, both occupants find it reasonable. Consequently, the act of reconciliation ultimately depends on the interests of all individuals involved in the dispute. Compromise may not always appear comfortable, it is, however, the most efficient, workable route towards settling disagreements and maintaining peace between conflicting persons; hence, the inability to compromise produces undesirable and upsetting results. This inability is strongly established in political affairs, human relations, and personal experiences.

Negotiation is considered one of the most important political virtues. The concept of concession, however, is sometimes absent in several political decisions and therefore, leading to war and chaos. A prime example is the Second World War. The causes of this war were predominantly nationalism, militarism, territorial issues, and most importantly, the Treaty of Versailles, which was embedded on Germany as disciplinary action for the ignition of World War I. Therefore, the prevention of World War II is often debated. Various individuals may argue that pacifying with Nazi Germany would not have stopped the war. Alternatively, the limitation of its immorality and destructiveness was probable. Reconciling with the Axis Powers - Italy and Japan - and the invaded territories was an achievable tactic. For instance, the invasion of France in 1940, by Nazi Germany, instigated France to sign a surrender agreement. Vichy France became the French state of 1940-1944, which collaborated with Germany, and had power of merely two fifths of its own state. Vichy France have accumulated over twenty thousand Jews. Thus, negotiating with the Allied Powers may perhaps have refrained France from Germany's mandates. Likewise, acting on commonsensicality, compromising with the Axis Powers to cease their military and spiteful actions for noble truce, may have controlled the mass destruction of Jews. Therefore, this is an approach towards limiting the inhumanity of World War II. In addition, the injustice between Israel and Palestine is the focus at present day. Both nations are combating for land by militaristic means. Israelis and Palestinians were kept apart by political barriers and both nations have been enemies since 1947. Nevertheless, Israelis and Palestinians ought to acknowledge each other as partners, having parity in everything: equal rights, to live free in peace, dignity and security, and accepting the notion that both belong to this piece of land. Jerusalem can serve as an open city as two capitals for both Israeli and Palestinian states. Thus, striving to reach consensus that is acceptable for both sides, will resolve most, if not all, conflicts between both nations. Furthermore, disputes between the government and its people results in protests, riots, and strikes. Once more, the concept of compromising is to find the middle ground in which both sides can find viable. In political affairs, one must urge to compromise otherwise the results of such actions are devastating.

In human relations, compromising is the ideal solution to all dilemmas. Searching for common ground will lead to long-term relationships. However, the failure in marriages is due to the inability to settle on accordance. An individual possesses hidden forces that identify one's self. A person's characteristics, beliefs, morals, and values are the hidden forces within every human being. These forces become visible in quarrels and disagreements between two participants. However, being able to negotiate is founded on an individual's beliefs, morals, and values, which is the ultimate cause that refrains one from compromising. Conversely, the refusal to pacify is thought to be a sign of weakness wherein it truly is a sign of strength. This notion of weakness is often accepted as true among everyone. Therefore, both sides of the argument do not surrender to search for the common ground, and when this persists within a relationship, the bond ruptures. Situations initiating with an uncomplicated dispute may perhaps emerge as an altercation. As a result, gender wars commence and unsatisfactory outcomes will eventuate to spousal abuse, divorce, child custody battles, and many other conflicts. Spouses ought to empathize with one another to resolve all discordances by finding the middle ground. Hence, the act of reaching consensus within human relations is beneficial to both persons, otherwise confrontation results in the failures of marriages.

Countless disputes are settled by the cooperation from both parties. However, the lack of ability to conciliate breaks the friendship between two persons, despite of the situation. Phil, a close friend, and I have decided to invest in a future trip to a foreign country of our interest. We deposited our savings in an aluminium depository, which is situated at his dwelling. Although I confide in him, I maintained a record of our investment regularly. On occasion, the current amount has reduced in comparison to the previous assessment of our savings. I was certain that it had been Phil withdrawing the money. However, I avoided the situation and portrayed as if nothing had occurred. As this continued, I decided to approach the situation. I have confronted him, and he denied that it was his doing. On the other hand, Phil had accused me of this act. The conflict grew into an intense argument. The consideration of compromise was absent, and I allegedly, at the time, felt that reconciling was a sign of weakness and defeat. As a result, the condition had worsened. Our dreams of travelling were shattered, including our friendship. The outcome was disastrous. Consequently, giving-in and negotiating would have resolved the conflict; however, we were reluctant to perceive it.

The unwillingness to compromise produces adverse results; therefore, it is nonetheless the most viable route that one can acquire to settle discordances and preserving the amity between opposing sides. Cooperating with one another is a political struggle. Most nations are stubborn and reluctant to appease with their opposition party. Although the Second World War could not have been prevented, the brutality and destructiveness of the war could have been limited. A probable approach would be to pacify with Germany's allies. The Israelis and Palestinians have battled for territory for the past fifty years. Both nations should merge and share the land with cooperation. The government and its people must reconcile in certain circumstances to avoid protests, riots, and strikes. In human relations, the inability to reach consensus results in failures of marriages; thus, both must collaborate with one another in order to sustain the marriage. In addition, one may have encountered a situation where confrontation have resulted in unfavourable results, such as the loss in friendship.

Add a Review for this free essay

Name: Rate: Select 10 (Good) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (Bad)

Comments Characters Left
Verify:*

Sticky Note Text....